Imagine a hypothetical interview at an established European company.
You have prepared to talk about growth, innovation and AI. Then you ask why the role is open.
The answer is quieter than you expected: a colleague is retiring after many years.
The business does not need a new department. It needs someone who can learn how the existing one works, take responsibility and help it adapt.
If your job search only follows expanding industries and fashionable titles, this kind of opening can be easy to overlook.
Europe’s next opportunity for you may involve work that already exists.
Growth is only one source of openings
On 21 July 2026, Cedefop announced an updated Skills Forecast covering employment trends to 2035. The release includes dedicated analysis of replacement demand: the need for people to take over work when others leave an occupation, primarily through retirement. [1]
This distinction matters because employment growth and recruitment are different measures.
Consider a simplified, hypothetical occupation with 1,000 workers. Over a period, its workforce shrinks to 900. If 200 existing workers leave and employers recruit 100 replacements, employment falls while hiring still occurs.
Those numbers are an illustration, not a forecast for any country or profession.
Cedefop’s indicator guidance makes the same underlying point: an occupation can have substantial replacement needs even when its total employment is expected to decline. [2]
That does not make every shrinking occupation a sensible career choice. It means a negative growth figure is not enough to answer the question “Will anyone be hiring?”
A forecast is a research lead, not an offer letter
The 2026 update projects EU employment growth of over 4% between 2023 and 2035. It also points to demographic pressures and different trends across occupations and countries. [1]
The forecast tool covers the EU-27 plus Iceland, Norway, North Macedonia, Switzerland and Türkiye. Its methodology uses harmonised data to support comparisons, and Cedefop explicitly warns that detailed estimates can carry substantial uncertainty. [3]
Use that evidence to choose questions worth investigating.
Do employers in your target occupation currently advertise relevant positions? What qualifications do they ask for? Is there a realistic route from your present experience to those responsibilities?
A projection to 2035 cannot tell you that a particular employer will recruit next month. Nor does it tell you whether an international applicant meets the language, qualification or work-authorisation requirements.
Long-term evidence is useful when it improves your next practical decision. It becomes misleading when it is presented as a queue of jobs waiting for anyone to arrive.
AI changes what gets handed over
There is a second reason to look carefully at an existing role: the employer may not want to replace every old task in exactly the same way.
The ILO’s May 2025 research on generative AI examines potential exposure at task level. It argues that transformation is more likely than full redundancy for most jobs, given the continuing need for human input. This is a global assessment of potential impact, not a record of European job losses. [4]
My practical inference is that a replacement vacancy deserves two questions: what must continue, and what is changing?
Imagine a hypothetical service coordinator who has long prepared routine reports manually. A successor might use approved software to assist with drafting, while still checking accuracy, handling exceptions and communicating with colleagues.
Or the organisation might redesign the work, distribute it among existing staff or decide not to recruit.
Retirement does not guarantee a vacancy. AI does not dictate a single outcome.
You need to understand the employer’s actual plan.
Make continuity part of your professional story
A replacement appointment can involve a sensitive handover. I would prepare examples that show how you learn unfamiliar work and make it dependable.
Have you documented a process so someone else could follow it? Taken responsibility for an existing project? Resolved an exception that the usual instructions did not cover?
Choose truthful examples. Explain the situation, what you did and what changed. If you do not have measured results, describe a concrete deliverable or verified outcome without inventing a percentage.
For a hypothetical candidate, a relevant example might be creating an onboarding checklist, identifying missing information and checking the revised process with the team.
That is an illustration of evidence to look for in your own history, not wording to copy as an achievement.
You can demonstrate curiosity about improvements while respecting the knowledge already inside an organisation.
The experienced person leaving the role is a potential teacher. Treat their judgment as something to learn from.
Ask about the handover before accepting the challenge
When a role appears to involve succession, these questions can make the interview more useful:
Is this an additional position or a replacement? Which responsibilities will remain, and which are being redesigned? What documentation and training will be available? Who will support the new person during the first months?
Ask what success would look like after three months. Then compare that expectation with the resources offered.
A team may describe a wonderful opportunity while expecting one newcomer to absorb years of undocumented knowledge immediately.
That is worth understanding before you commit.
Look at workload, pay, management support and learning opportunities alongside the job title. If relocation is involved, investigate the practical requirements and costs separately.
Being needed is encouraging. Being supported matters too.
Build a shortlist that includes established work
For your next search session, pick one occupation you can plausibly enter and one country you can seriously consider.
Review its employment direction and replacement-demand information in Cedefop’s Skills Forecast. Note the period, geographic scope and occupational category rather than copying a headline percentage.
Then find current vacancies on employer websites and official employment portals. Read them individually. Do not assume that an advertisement is a retirement replacement unless the employer says so.
Look for responsibilities that connect to work you have already done. Identify the gaps that require formal training, recognition or stronger language skills.
Choose a small number of credible matches. For each, prepare one example of taking ownership and one of learning or improving an existing process.
This approach will not remove competition or guarantee an offer. It gives you another way to recognise opportunities without chasing every new label attached to work.
Your next chapter does not require a brand-new profession.
Sometimes it begins when an organisation needs someone to carry important work forward—and you are ready to learn what that responsibility means.
Your next practical step
Use Best CV Tool to make your relevant experience clear. Include truthful examples of taking ownership, learning unfamiliar work and improving existing processes.
Build your targeted CV →Sources and further reading
- [1] Cedefop: Updated Skills Forecast to 2035, 21 July 2026
- [2] Cedefop: Skills Intelligence indicator definitions—future employment needs and job openings. Accessed 31 October 2026
- [3] Cedefop: Skills Forecast—methodology and replacement-demand tool. Accessed 31 October 2026
- [4] ILO: Generative AI and jobs—A 2025 update, 20 May 2025
About the author
Fahad Khan is a Berlin-based UI/UX and product designer and the founder of Best CV Tool. He writes The European Offer Letter about building a career in Europe as work and hiring change.
